You Are Being RedirectedThis blog has been moved to http://resourceadvisor.com/blog/. You will be redirected in a moment. If you are not redirected in 10 seconds, click here.

2 Jan 27 2011 @ 10:21am by Matt Smith in Crude Oil, Global Energy, Natural Gas, Risk Strategy

Hotchpotch

In recent weeks I’ve received a number of questions about natural gas, so I wanted to take this hotchpotch of queries and address three of them in a post. So here it goes. 

Question 1: Do you think the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 has contributed to the stalled speculation of NYMEX Natural Gas futures contracts?

I don’t believe there is stalled speculation in natural gas; the chart below affirms this. Short positions held by non-commercials (i.e., speculators such as hedge funds) are climbing again toward the realm of previous record highs. As an aside, a further hat-tip to the bears is that short positions held by producers (= commercials) have jumped to a three year high in the last week. It is key to remember that a sideways market does not mean there is less speculation; there is still volatility in the market after all. Just because we are not seeing huge price swings or sustained movement in one direction, doesn’t mean there is not speculation at play:   

CFTC Natural Gas Non-commercial short positions (combined)

Question 2: Why do you think there continues to be so much gas supply pouring into the market at these low prices? It seems to me that there should have been a price response by now…but it has not seemed to happen. Are these harvesting companies just happy to make whatever they can?

In no particular order of importance, here’s some reasons as to why production continues be near record levels:

–Horizontal rigs (of which we are seeing record levels, see below) can cover more area than conventional rigs, making the whole process more efficient / cost-effective as the output per rig is higher
–Producers are locked into long-term contracts (and likely at higher prices)
–Producers are loss-leading (it is more cost-effective for them to continue at a loss than shut down production and re-start when prices move higher) 
–Producers have to drill due to leasing permit requirements
–Production of associated natural gas (a by-product of oil production) is rising 

Horizontal Gas Rig Count

Question 3: It seems that everyone has been focused on celebrating the shift in natural gas to hydraulic fracturing in shale formations….but it seems that natural gas rigs / companies have been tapping into to more profitable oil. Is there really even a sizeable shift in the industry that would be sustained despite the volatility in oil prices? If so should we expect to see the change shift the current bearish fundamentals to a more bullish outlook? 

It is logical that companies would be trying to shift away from natural gas drilling with prices so low, especially with crude oil looking to enter triple-digitdom. However, just as you cannot change an oil rig to a gas rig simply by flipping a switch, there is more at play here than meets the eye. Comparatively higher costs involved in drilling for oil is dissuading some interest (although profit for Baker Hughes has just quadrupled on demand for drilling), while rising costs will continue according to Moody’s Investors Services ‘as natural gas producers will have to keep working their plays amid unfavorable economic conditions’ (a point highlighted above in question 2). So although crude prices are unlikely to become much less attractive, natural gas production levels will maintain their resilience. Due to increased efficiencies (another point highlighted in the previous question), rigs will have to fall considerably to materially impact production. So while only a minor fall in production is forecast for 2011(0.3%  in 2011 according to the EIA)  it is unlikely we will see a more bullish outlook for natural gas fundamentals – at least not in 2011.

I hope these responses have been useful – thanks to those for sending in questions, keep ’em coming. I’d like to end this hotchpotch on a lighter note; I am fortunate enough to now have a blog on the Houston Chronicle’s Fuelfix, where among other things I re-post some of the burrito material. In response to last week’s post on Bob Dylan, I got the below comment from ‘Andy’. I was perturbed for 3 seconds, then laughed for 10:

I have never in my life read a dumber article referencing music to describe the economics of the energy sector. And using Dylan’s liberal leaning song titles to describe the current situation is absolutely idiotic. Go review music or something, Smith.

Anyway, I’m off to complete (another) job application for Rolling Stone; rock on!

2 Comments on this post:

  1. James Grasso says:

    Matt…There have been plenty of times in the past when gas supply levels exceeded historic averages, yet prices continued to rise; most notably in 2007. And as your chart depicts, there was a steady increase in short positions for much of the past decade while prices continued to climb. How do you explain this inconsistency of theory?

  2. Matt Smith says:

    Hi James, the question asked was not about prices rising when supply was strong; the question asked was about current ‘stalled speculation’. But it hasn’t, and the chart proves this.

    If your question is why do short positions increase when prices rise, this highlights the increased participation in the market, and also that speculation does not drive price. A couple of posts ago I posted the chart of crude oil longs – showing a similar increasing number of positions taken, just in the other direction – http://www.energyburrito.com/the-best-things-in-life-arent-things/

    Great question though.

Leave a comment:

» will not be published